- Meeting abstract
- Open Access
What are the baseline measurements for physeal plate widths in healthy, uninjured children?
© Ng et al; licensee Springer. 2012
- Published: 18 December 2012
- Absolute Difference
- Growth Plate
- Injured Child
- Distal Tibia
- Focus Ultrasound
There is limited data on the sonographic evaluation of normative physeal plate measurements in healthy, uninjured children.
To determine the baseline measurements for physeal plate widths in healthy, uninjured children.
This is a prospective observational study of a convenience sample of healthy patients between ages 0 and 12 years presenting to the pediatric emergency department. A focused ultrasound of the distal tibia, fibula, radius and ulna were performed bilaterally (8 total). Measurements were taken at the physeal plates in the longitudinal plane at the widest distance. The degree of variance of physeal plate widths within an individual and the average values of physeal plates for each bone were calculated.
A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age of enrolled patients was 6 years 3 months, 38% of who were female. Mean physeal plate diameters for the averaged measurement of each bone were: tibia 0.33 cm (95% CI 0.29 – 0.36), fibula 0.31 cm (95% CI 0.28 – 0.34), radius 0.27 cm (95% CI 0.24 – 0.30) and ulna 0.32 cm (95% CI 0.27 – 0.36). Mean values for the absolute difference in physeal plate diameters were: tibia 0.06 cm (95% CI 0.04 – 0.07), fibula 0.06 cm (95% CI 0.04 – 0.07), radius 0.05 cm (95% CI 0.04 – 0.07), and ulna 0.1 cm (95% CI 0.05 – 0.16). When measurements were stratified by age, the confidence intervals for each averaged measurement narrowed with increasing age while the absolute difference in physeal plate diameters remained consistent.
This pilot study demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference in physeal plate diameters between contralateral extremities and the degree of variation between contralateral extremities was minimal. Results of this study elucidate normative growth plate variance in healthy children and demonstrate that mean plate measurements and absolute differences are narrow. This study suggests that sonographic detection of significant disparities in physeal plate diameters of injured children may have the potential for earlier detection of Salter Harris injuries with subsequent appropriate referral and management.
- Chamberlain JM, Patel KM, Pollack MM, et al.: Recalibration of the pediatric risk of admission score using a multi-institutional sample. Ann Emerg Med 2004, 43: 461. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.08.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilkins KE, Aroojis AJ: Incidence of fractures in children. In: Rockwood & Wilkins' Fractures in Children. 6th edition. Edited by: Beaty, JH, Kasser, JR. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia; 2006:12.Google Scholar
- Carson S, Woolridge DP, Colletti J, Kilgore K: Pediatric upper extremity injuries. Pediatr Clin North Am 2006, 53: 41. 10.1016/j.pcl.2005.10.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peterson HA, Madhok R, Benson JT, et al.: Physeal fractures: part 1. Epidemiology in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979–1988. J Pediatr Orthop 1994, 14: 423. 10.1097/01241398-199407000-00002PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sankar WN, Chen J, Kay RM, Skaggs DL: Incidence of occult fracture in children with acute ankle injuries. J Pediatr Orthop 2008,28(5):500–1. 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31817b9336PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simanovsky N, Hiller N, Leibner E, Simanovsky N: Sonographic detection of radiographically occult fractures in paediatric ankle injuries. Pediatr Radiol 2005,35(11):1062–5. 10.1007/s00247-005-1536-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Farley FA, Kuhns L, Jacobson JA, DiPietro M: Ultrasound examination of ankle injuries in children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 2001, 21: 604–607.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gleeson AP, Stuart MJ, Wilson B, Phillips B: Ultrasound assessment and conservative management of inversion injuries of the ankle in children: Plaster of paris vs. tubigrip. Journal of bone and joint surgery 1196, 78-B: 484–7.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.