Volume 7 Supplement 1

10th WINFOCUS World Congress on Ultrasound in Emergency and Critical Care

Open Access

Accuracy of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum

  • P Nazerian1Email author,
  • C Tozzetti1,
  • A Petrioli1,
  • M Ottaviani1,
  • F Trausi1,
  • M Baioni1 and
  • S Grifoni1
Critical Ultrasound Journal20157(Suppl 1):A14

https://doi.org/10.1186/2036-7902-7-S1-A14

Published: 9 March 2015

Background

Clinical signs and symptoms of pneumoperitoneum are not specific and abdomen radiography is positive in less than 50% of cases. Ultrasonography (US) accuracy for the diagnosis of pneuperitoneum is still unknown.

Objective

1) define the accuracy of abdominal US for the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum; 2) define the accuracy of a “2 scan-fast exam” vs a full abdominal exam; 3) compare accuracy of US and abdomen radiography

Patients and methods

Study patients: 11 consecutive adults with a diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum by CT. Control patients: 11 consecutive adults with severe acute abdominal pain with a diagnosis other than pneumoperitoneum by CT. US examination has been performed with a convex and a linear probe using the following scans: epigastrium, right and left hypocondrium, umbelical area and right hypocondrium. All exams were recorded in a video of 5 seconds and each videos reviewed by 2 radiologists and 2 senior physicians blinded to other imaging studies. The reviewers fulfilled a standardized form signing for each scan either presence or absence of pneumoperitonem signs (enhancement of the peritoneum stripe with ring-down artifacts or “comet tails” starting from peritoneum). If one of the signs of pneumopeitoneum was present in at least one scan, the patient was considered to have a US diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum. The reviewers also evaluated abdomen radiography for the presence/absence of pneumoperitoneum. CT was considered the gold standard.

Results

1) Accuracy of abdomen US was 88.6%. Sensitivities of convex and linear probes were similar (88.6% vs 84.1%), while specificity of convex was lower than linear probe (81.8% vs 95.5%). 2) Accuracy of a “2 scan-fast exam” was similar to global exam (87.5%). 3) Abdominal radiography sensitivity (72.2%) was lower than US while specificity (92.5%) was higher.

Conclusions

Abdominal US has a good accuracy. The 2 scan-fast exam has a similar accuracy of the full abdominal exam. US sensitivity is superior to abdominal radiography thus ultrasonography can be a useful imaging modality for the detection of pneumoperitoneum.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Emergency Medicine and Radiology Department, Careggi University Hospital

Copyright

© Nazerian et al; licensee Springer. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.