Open Access

Point-of-care transcranial Doppler by intensivists

Critical Ultrasound Journal20179:21

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0077-9

Received: 26 June 2017

Accepted: 6 October 2017

Published: 13 October 2017

Abstract

In the unconscious patient, there is a diagnostic void between the neurologic physical exam, and more invasive, costly and potentially harmful investigations. Transcranial color-coded sonography and two-dimensional transcranial Doppler imaging of the brain have the potential to be a middle ground to bridge this gap for certain diagnoses. With the increasing availability of point-of-care ultrasound devices, coupled with the need for rapid diagnosis of deteriorating neurologic patients, intensivists may be trained to perform point-of-care transcranial Doppler at the bedside. The feasibility and value of this technique in the intensive care unit to help rule-in specific intra-cranial pathologies will form the focus of this article. The proposed scope for point-of-care transcranial Doppler for the intensivist will be put forth and illustrated using four representative cases: presence of midline shift, vasospasm, raised intra-cranial pressure, and progression of cerebral circulatory arrest. We will review the technical details, including methods of image acquisition and interpretation. Common pitfalls and limitations of point-of-care transcranial Doppler will also be reviewed, as they must be understood for accurate diagnoses during interpretation, as well as the drawbacks and inadequacies of the modality in general.

Keywords

Point-of-care ultrasound Midline shift Vasospasm Intra-cranial pressure Cerebral circulatory arrest Neuro-critical care

Background

In the absence of consciousness, a complete neurological exam is not always possible. Limited to the assessment of brainstem structures for neurological function (pupils, Glasgow Coma Scale, Cushing’s reflex, cranial nerve reflexes/responses and respiratory pattern), the intensivist at the bedside must instead rely on other tools to characterize sub-catastrophic anatomic events, as some of the above findings can be non-specific for the etiology of decreased level of consciousness. Most typically, this involves the use of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and in many cases, an invasive intra-cranial pressure (ICP) monitoring through insertion of an intracerebral catheter. Though these tools offer great value, they also introduce well-defined risks of transport or radiation [1, 2], and risk of an invasive procedure [3, 4], as well as delays in identifying and managing time-sensitive neurologic processes [5]. A more immediate, non-invasive, bedside approach to complement these existing methods is therefore of interest.

In 1982, Aaslid et al. introduced into clinical practice the use of transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography. TCD offers a non-invasive means of evaluating intra-cranial blood vessel flow and velocity with color and spectral Doppler [6]. The utility is evident, as it remains a cornerstone for neurologists, neurosurgeons, and intensivists in the identification of vasospasm after sub-arachnoid hemorrhage [79]. TCD may also be used to roughly predict ICP [1014] as well characterize the alterations in blood flow that occur during intra-cranial cerebral circulatory arrest from severely raised ICP [15], although TCD cannot be used as a surrogate for invasive ICP monitor [16, 17].

As ultrasound technology has improved, the same transcranial acoustic windows used for the Doppler assessment of the cerebral circulation may also be used to achieve two-dimensional (2D) images of the brain parenchyma. Though anatomic detail is inferior to CT imaging, resolution is sufficient to answer emergent bedside questions such as mass effect leading to midline shift [1820] and predict adverse outcomes after stroke [21, 22]. Given phenomena such as elevated ICP, vasospasm, midline shift, and brain death are of routine concern in the intensive care unit (ICU), it is appealing to consider this skill in the hands of the intensivist at the bedside for the expedition of care. Similar to all other point-of-care (POC) ultrasound applications, immediate, round-the-clock availability and repeatability in response to interventions or clinical change are particular advantages of TCD being in the hands of the intensivist. Additionally, resource-limited settings (remote areas, low-income countries, combat field, sports arenas, etc.) where CT access is scarce may be of particular benefit to acute care providers.

Despite the widespread availability of portable ultrasound machines in the ICU (due largely to the significant uptake of point-of-care echocardiography and critical care ultrasound in the critical care community), uptake of point-of-care TCD has not been observed. In the face of barriers to uptake such as the omission of TCD from the internationally adopted critical care ultrasound competency statement [23], it is important to illustrate the potential value and influence that point-of-care TCD may yield in the hands of the intensivist. To this end, our review will highlight potential applications of point-of-care TCD and how it may be used to screen four specific entities. Through four representative cases, the reader will be briefed on the theoretical and technical aspects of intensivist-conducted TCD for expedition of care. We will also describe the common pitfalls and limitations that are common to the technique.

Example case descriptions

All figures/tables associated with the following cases in this article are original submissions.

Case 1: midline shift

A 58-year-old female presented with a headache and decreased level of consciousness (LOC), and is found to have diffuse SAH, intra-cranial hemorrhage (ICH), and intra-ventricular hemorrhage (IVH) from a right middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm with only 2 mm of initial midline shift measured by CT head. The patient had further deterioration in her neurological status with concerns of about increasing mass effect from her hemorrhages, and a point-of-care (POC) TCD 2D image was obtained (Fig. 1a, b), which found that her midline shift had increased to 6.5 mm towards the left:
$${\text{Midline shift }}\left( {\text{MLS}} \right) = \left( {{\text{distance A}} - {\text{distance B}}} \right)/ 2$$
$${\text{Midline shift }}\left( {\text{MLS}} \right) = ( 7. 4 1- 6. 1 1 \;{\text{cm}})/ 2 = 1. 3 \;{\text{cm}}/ 2 = 0. 6 5 \;{\text{cm}} = 6. 5 \;{\text{mm}}$$
Fig. 1

Transcranial imaging for midline shift. a Insonation from right temporal bone to third ventricle, representing distance A (7.41 cm). b Insonation from left temporal bone to third ventricle, representing distance B (6.11 cm). c Follow-up CT scan post TCD which reveals midline shift to be 7 mm

This was later confirmed on urgent repeat CT head imaging (Fig. 1c) of 7 mm towards the left secondary to enlarging ICH.

Case 2: vasospasm

An 83-year-old male with diffuse SAH from a right anterior-communicating (AComm) artery aneurysm (Fig. 2a), secured by coiling. Despite prophylactic nimodipine to improve outcomes in vasospasm patients, 5 days later, patient again had decreased LOC and required intubation. An urgent CT head was arranged, and an urgent bedside POC TCD (Fig. 2b) was rapidly performed, showing a mean velocity of 123 cm/s, with a Lindegaard ratio of 3.8 (Fig. 2c) which correspond with TCD signs of mild vasospasm (Additional file 1: Video 1). CT-angiogram confirmed this, including moderate vasospasm in the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) territories. This prompted hypertensive therapy with vasopressors as per local neurosurgical standard of care. Follow-up serial screening TCDs and CT-As by radiology showed worsening to severe vasospasm in all vascular territories, first diagnosed on POC TCD.
Fig. 2

Transcranial Doppler for vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage. a CT Head demonstrating diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage. b TCD measurement of left MCA flows, demonstrating a mean MCA velocity of 123 cm/s (in-keeping with mild vasospasm). c Measurement of ipsilateral left ICA flows for calculation of Lindegaard ratio of 3.8 (Mean MCA/ICA velocity = 123/32.5 cm/s), which confirmed mild MCA vasospasm

Case 3: raised intra-cranial pressure

A 74-year-old male, previously on dual antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel) for cardiac stents, fell down 15 stairs. He was diagnosed with traumatic brain injury (TBI) on CT head (Fig. 3a) with diffuse sub-SAH and subdural hemorrhage (SDH), with an admission GCS of 14. GCS rapidly deteriorated to three, and a POC TCD was performed immediately (Additional file 2: Video 2) as the neurosurgeon was already preparing to insert an EVD following intubation. TCD was performed simultaneously while scalp was prepped on contralateral side. Interrogation of the MCA flows (Fig. 3b) showed a pulsatility index of 4.31 (equating to an ICP of 46 mmHg by TCD). The extra-ventricular drain (EVD) was placed at the bedside for therapeutic effect and confirmed the TCD findings of ICP elevation (EVD monitor measured ICP = 42 mmHg). After appropriate neuro-resuscitative measures (osmotic therapy, vasoactive agents and ICP drainage via EVD), a follow-up POC TCD (Fig. 3c) showed decreased ICP (TCD pulsatility index = 1.65, ICP = 17 mmHg). These dynamic changes were also mirrored in agreement with the EVD monitor (EVD ICP = 16 mmHg).
Fig. 3

Raised intra-cranial pressure by spectral Doppler on TCD, as calculated by pulsatility index. a Diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage on CT head. b Spectral Doppler of MCA, demonstrating diastolic blunting secondary to raised ICP (pulsatility index = 4.31, ICP = 46 mmHg). c Following interventions to reduce ICP, there was normalization of diastolic flow in the MCA, and resolution of high ICP (pulsatility index = 1.65, ICP = 17 mmHg)

Case 4: cerebral circulatory arrest

A 63-year-old male presented with retro-orbital headaches was diagnosed with an AComm artery aneurysm which underwent a coiling attempt. During the procedure, however, the patient had internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection, trans-mural perforation and pseudo-aneurysm formation. CT head revealed diffuse SAH from aneurysmal rupture with IVH (Fig. 4a). An EVD was placed immediately at bedside, which showed raised ICP (> 60 mmHg). A poor prognosis was given and goals of care changed to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The patient subsequently developed dilated pupils bilaterally and had hemodynamic alterations in keeping with a Cushing’s response. A POC TCD was obtained serially to determine and characterize the progression to brain death through the predictable spectral Doppler evolution: diastolic blunting, diastolic flow reversal, and, finally, biphasic/oscillating flow (Fig. 4b–d).
Fig. 4

Step-wise progression of cerebral circulatory arrest. a CT Head demonstrating diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage. b Evidence of raised ICP causing decreased diastolic flow as evidenced by blunting of the spectral Doppler signal. c Further progression with diastolic flow reversal as raised ICP prevents forward flow in MCA, and even induces backwards flow. d Biphasic and oscillating flow as evidenced by net zero flow (where systolic and diastolic flow are near equal to each other), indicating the first TCD stage of cerebral circulatory arrest

Methods

Ultrasound technique

To perform a TCD or TCD image (TCDI), place your patient in the supine position with the head of bed > 30° (not always possible in ICU patients). Use a 1–5 MHz phased array ultrasound transducer with a TCD preset, or if unavailable, a cardiac preset. For either preset, the sonographer must ensure that the lowest Nyquist level should be selected (~ 20 cm/s) for color-coded duplex sonography (CDDS). Place the probe on the trans-temporal window (Fig. 5a), with the index mark pointed towards the patient’s anterior/front (Fig. 5b). With the index mark orientated to screen left, identify the ipsilateral/contralateral temporal bones, and the third ventricle (a midline structure) (Fig. 5c). Decrease the depth to the distance of the third ventricle in the far-field and identify the cerebral penducles and echogenic basal cisterns. Then place a color Doppler box over the top half of the screen (near field) where the MCA is located, just lateral to the cerebral penducles. Identify the MCA as indicated by red color Doppler signal towards the probe. Then interrogate the MCA by placing the pulse wave marker on top of the MCA, and obtain the spectral Doppler waveforms (Fig. 5d). Angle correction should be utilized upon the insonation of vessels in order to adjust the pulse wave Doppler for the angle of insonation.
Fig. 5

Method for acquisition of transcranial Doppler. a Left side shows location of the trans-temporal window and its various sections: frontal, anterior, medial, and posterior. Right side illustrates Circle of Willis, with MCA highlighted. b Probe index mark orientation towards the patient’s anterior/front. c Typical 2D image of TCD from trans-temporal window with index mark to screen left, with bright echogenic contralateral temporal bone, and anechoic space of midline third ventricle. d Typical spectral Doppler velocity waveform from MCA, with steep systolic upstroke and step-down diastolic flow (typical mean velocity of 80 cm/s)

MCA interrogation should be obtained at 0.5 cm for the M1 segment, and 0.4 cm for the M2 segment of the MCA. Intervals at its most distal point to the bifurcation of the proximal ICA into the MCA and ACA, to screen for focal vasospasm. The trans-temporal window can also insonate the ACAs (anterior angulation, depth 6–7 cm), terminal ICAs (caudal angulation, 6–7 cm), and PCAs (posterior angulation, 5.5–7.5 cm), bilaterally. The protocol is repeated for the opposite hemisphere. Trans-orbital and trans-foraminal windows are more typical for complete diagnostic TCD, and will not be discussed as part of POC TCD.

Discussion

This review seeks to characterize what we feel are the four major point-of-care applications for TCD in the hands of critical care providers. There are many more additional potential indications and applications for the use of TCD at the point-of-care (full list shown in Table 1). However, outside of the four chosen POC TCD indications, the remainder are the scope of formal TCD, as they require additional training [11, 12, 18, 22, 2432].
Table 1

Indications for transcranial ultrasonography and Doppler

Indication

Midline shift

Vasospasm (post-subarachnoid hemorrhage)

Intra-cranial pressure (ICP)

Cerebral circulatory arrest (brain death)

Stenosis

Occlusion/stroke

Micro-emboli (transient ischemic attack or stroke)

Right-to-left shunts (paradoxical emboli)

Sickle cell hyperemia versus stenosis

Intra-cranial hemorrhage detection and monitoring

Cerebral motor vasoactivity

A–V malformation assessments

Syncope or positional vertigo

There are several advantages to use of transcranial imaging and Doppler. It is quick, with no radiation exposure (unlike CT), and requires no patient transport (unlike MRI or CT). Additionally, unlike traditional 4-vessel angiography, TCD is a non-invasive means of monitoring for vasospasm, stenosis, stroke, ICP or cerebral circulatory arrest [18, 19, 24]. Accuracy of point-of-care TCD is unknown, the diagnostic sensitivity of TCD in the hands of expert sonographers is quite good, reaching 89–98% for the MCA [18, 19].

The four themes will be further characterized here with a focus on the technical elements as well as the value of rapid application at the bedside. As with any ultrasound modality, the acquisition of images and Doppler information is operator-dependent, and there are several limitations and pitfalls to TCD acquisition and interpretation, discussed within each topic.

Midline shift

Diagnosis of midline shift is important both for preventing further secondary neurological injury by early neurosurgical intervention, but also neuro-prognostication. Any amount of midline shift is considered abnormal, but poor neurological outcome can be associated with a clinically significant midline shift of as little as 0.5 cm (positive predictive value (PPV) of 78% with presence of midline shift [20, 25], as opposed to a 14% PPV without the presence of midline shift), and a twofold increase in mortality associated with greater than 1-cm midline shift (53% vs 25%) [21, 22].

Seidel et al. illustrated the use of ultrasonography for the measurement of midline shift. Reproducibility of MLS via ultrasound corresponded to 0.3 ± 0.2 mm in ten volunteers [20]. Measurements on ultrasound have correlated well with CT findings [2022], and have been predictive of poor outcome from midline shift secondary to pathologies such as stroke, hemorrhage (subdural, epidural, subarachnoid), and traumatic brain injury [2022, 25, 26].

There are two methods to quantify midline shift. One method (see Fig. 1a, b) is to measure the distance from the bilateral temporal bones to the midline third ventricle. Distance A is measured from the ipsilateral side, whereas distance B is from the contralateral side. One should also measure the full length from the ipsilateral to the contralateral temporal bone. Then use the following equation to calculate the midline shift deviation:
$${\text{Midline shift }}\left( {\text{MLS}} \right) = \left( {{\text{distance A}} - {\text{distance B}}} \right)/ 2$$
For an expedited investigation, the other method (see Fig. 1a, b) would be to measure from the ipsilateral side to the third ventricle only (distance C), and then also measure the full distance from the ipsilateral temporal bone to the contralateral temporal bone (distance D), then calculate MLS with this equation:
$${\text{Midline shift }}\left( {\text{MLS}} \right) = {\text{distance C}} - \left( {{\text{distance D}}/ 2} \right)$$

With either method, if the MLS is positive, this means that the MLS is away from the ipsilateral side. If the MLS is negative, the MLS is toward the ipsilateral side.

Our recommendation is to utilize the first method for midline shift quantification. With 2 independent measurements from each side to assess midline shift and an internal check for correct measurements (the sum of distance A and B should equal the full distance from the ipsilateral to contralateral temporal bones), it is the least vulnerable to operator error. Clinical utilization of TCD or TCDI for midline shift also incorporates comparisons of measured cerebral blood flow velocities and pulsatility indexes between right and left anterior circulation. This will be discussed in the vasospasm and raised ICP sections, as discrepant findings and asymmetry in CBFs and PIs are a main indicator of potential midline shift.

Midline shift: limitations

Due to thicker cranial vaults causing higher bone attenuation, the literature states that 5–20% of patients will have difficult views leading to un-interpretable transcranial windows and images [18, 19]. MLS measurement relies heavily on finding a proper trans-temporal window. There are no data correlating angle of insonation and accuracy of transcranial US midline shift measurements. AIUM guidelines state that the upward angle of insonation should be no greater than 10–15° [7], but that may not always be possible. The presence of hydrocephalus of the third ventricle does not have much bearing on the MLS measurement, as the measurements are done to the center of the third ventricle, not to its outer walls. However, hydrocephalus does help predict the need for EVD insertion and for safe EVD removal. Kiphuth et al. observed that TCD was a reliable method for predicting the necessity for CSF drainage. In patients with external ventricular drainage (EVD), they estimated that a cut-off value of an increase of 5.5 mm in ventricle width after clamping had a high sensitivity (100%) and negative predictive value (100%). They suggested that an increase in ventricular width lower than the cut-off was an indication for a safe removal of EVD [27].

Vasospasm

Transcranial Doppler has been studied extensively as a validated screening tool for diagnosing vasospasm [6, 7, 2841], aiding in the management of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. Diagnosis of vasospasm post-SAH greatly affects prognosis, causing significant morbidity secondary to strokes from delayed cerebral ischemia, and mortality in 15–20% of patients [8, 37, 39]. Using the inverse relationship between cerebral blood vessel diameter and TCD mean velocities, we are able to quantify and subcategorize vasospasm [25, 35, 36].

Assessment of the MCA requires pulse wave spectral Doppler. The normal spectral Doppler profile of the MCA has a sharp systolic upstroke with a step-wise diastolic deceleration, with a normal mean velocity of the MCA that is usually < 80 cm/s. Mild vasospasm mean velocities are 120–159 cm/s, moderate vasospasm is 160–199 cm/s, and severe vasospasm is > 200 cm/s. These cutoffs have been derived using non-imaging traditional TCD probes as are commonly used in complete, diagnostic TCD [6, 9, 28, 36, 42]. Progressive increase of mean velocities during the early stages of SAH to predictive of vasospasm. Authors have cited a change in baseline mean velocity of > 21 cm/s per 24 h in the first 3 days to be diagnostic of vasospasm [39, 43]. Symptomatic clinical vasospasm is often only seen at mean velocities of 160 cm/s [38].

Another method of grading vasospasm severity would be the formula known as the Lindegaard ratio [36]:
$${\text{Lindegaard ratio}} = {\text{Ipsilateral MCA mean velocity}}/{\text{ipsilateral extra}} - {\text{Cranial ICA mean velocity}}.$$

As entities other than vasospasm (e.g., hyper-dynamic flow) may increase mean velocities, the Lindegaard ratio does not grade vasospasm, but helps differentiate between hyperemia (induced by medial or endovascular treatment) versus the onset of true vasospasm. If the Lindegaard ratio > 3, this would diagnose vasospasm, as increased flow velocity would be raised in the cerebral circulation relative to the carotid circulation. A Lindegaard ratio of 3–5 would denote mild-moderate vasospasm, while a ratio > 6 would indicate severe vasospasm [36].

Vasospasm: limitations

The diagnostic value of TCD clinical utilization to detect vasospasm is not in question. All relevant professional societies, like American Heart Association, American Society of Neuroimaging, and American Institute for Ultrasound in Medicine all recommend TCD utilization for vasospasm [7, 4446]. Compared to CT-angiogram, the sensitivity/specificity of the MCA is quite good (~ 89–98%). However, the trans-orbital and trans-foraminal windows are less reliably insonated compared to the trans-temporal window [47], and the ACA and PCA are less sensitive and specific for vasospasm compared to the MCA. The same applies to the basilar artery and vertebral artery with lower sensitivity and specificity in the trans-foraminal window [30, 31]. Exhaustive exclusion of vasospasm calls for all cerebral vessels to be insonated. Thus, the technique as we have described it represents a screening test of the highest yield arterial territory (MCA)—of greatest value if vasospasm is identified and insufficient to exclude the possibility [6, 42].

Several factors make the diagnosis of vasospasm challenging. The clinician must be mindful that cerebral blood flow maybe influenced by many factors (PaO2, PaCO2, blood viscosity, collateral flow). Furthermore, operator experience is required for accurate assessment, as improper vessel identification, proximal lesions and aberrant vessel course can confound even experienced sonographers [9].

For Doppler interrogation, diagnostic TCD utilizes non-imaging probes set for measurement of spectral Doppler signs at specific distances to insonate various vessels in question. However, most radiology departments now use color-coded duplex sonography (CDDS) imaging probes with pulse wave Doppler and angle correction [48]. The advantage to using CDDS imaging probes is that insonation no longer needs a perfectly on-axis due to anatomic variations between different segments of cerebral arteries, as machines are able to solve for off-axis measurements using angle correction. The caveat is that normal velocities reported for TCD are validated for non-imaging probes and not for color-coded duplex sonography [48]. However, many radiology departments utilize CDDS instead of traditional non-imaging TCD probes despite the lack of validation prior. Absolute velocities obtained from CDDS would be underestimated, but CDDS angle correction has been shown to be no different than velocities obtained from traditional TCD [49].

Intra-cranial pressure

TCD can be used to give a rough estimate for ICP, to help rule-in high ICP, but not as a surrogate for accurate invasive ICP monitors. As ICP increases, flow in intra-cranial vessels changes. Initially, systolic velocity increases (i.e., systolic peak flows) as increased ICP causes cerebral vessels to narrow from external pressure in the MCA. During diastole, diastolic flow becomes decreased/blunted (Fig. 3b), as raised ICP becomes the predominant external pressure opposing forward MCA flow during diastole. Raised ICP can also exceed normal forward flow during diastole, leading to diastolic flow reversal (Fig. 6) [10, 15].
Fig. 6

Progression of intra-cranial circulatory arrest via transcranial Doppler of middle cerebral artery flows. a Normal systolic upstroke with normal step-down of diastolic flow. b Increased peak systolic flow with decreasing diastolic flow and eventual blunting of diastolic flow. c Diastolic flow reversal. d Biphasic or oscillating flow—where diastolic flow reversal approaches equal size to systolic flow. e Isolated sharp systolic peak flows of < 200 ms and small systolic amplitude of < 50 cm/s. f Zero flow—where there was previously documented TCD flow. The red box denotes states (d, e, f) in which cerebral circulatory arrest can be diagnosed

Raised ICP can be estimated using the Gosling’s pulsatility index, which is a reflection of peripheral resistance, which is equal to the difference between the peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (ESV), divided by the mean velocity (MV) [10, 4951]:
$${\text{Pulsatility index }}\left( {\text{PI}} \right) = \left[ {{\text{PSV}} - {\text{EDV}}} \right]/{\text{MV}}.$$
Bellner et al. correlated pulsatility index (PI) to ICP in clinical practice. Generally, high ICPs result in high pulsatility indices (PIs) in high-resistance vascular beds, where systolic velocity is increased relative to decreased end-diastolic velocity. This translates to an increased systolic-to-diastolic (S/D) ratio and an increased pulsatility index. A formula has been derived to convert pulsatility index into ICP (from all causes), with a sensitivity of 89%, and specificity of 92% [10].
$${\text{ICP}} = ( 10. 9 3 \times {\text{PI}}) - 1. 2 8.$$
Based on this formula, a PI of > 2.13 would correlate to an ICP > 22 mmHg (based on new Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines cutoffs) [52], which is the clinically significant cutoff for raised ICP, and would compromise cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) [10, 5355], whereas normal pulsatility index (PI) is < 1.2, and corresponds to an ICP of approximately 12 mmHg (normal ICP = 5–15 mmHg) [28]. The main advantage of PI is that it is not affected by the angle of insonation [18]. This is one of many TCD-derived PI formulas for estimation of ICP [12, 5658]. Some suggest using TCD as a binary assessment for the absence of intra-cranial hypertension [12].

Intra-cranial pressure: limitations

The main limitation of TCD PI correlation to ICP is that caution must be exercised given its wide confidence intervals when compared directly to ICP monitors [16, 17]. Other literature suggests that TCD PI is not a reliable correlate to ICP [13, 16, 17, 5964]. Decreased PaCO2 or increased arterial blood pressure (ABP) alterations can influence cerebral blood flow and PI independently of ICP. Decreases in CPP (representing an increasing trend in PI) can be from increased ICP, but also decreases in mean arterial pressure (MAP). Therefore, instead of assuming linear correlation with ICP, PI can rather be understood to be inversely proportional to mean CPP or directly proportional to ABP, and a non-linear proportion to artery/arteriole compliance in the cerebral bed, cerebrovascular resistance, and heart rate. As such, recommendations for utilization of increasing PI for following increasing ICP and decreasing CPP trends across time, rather than ICP absolute values [59].

Although not a continuous means of ICP measurement, TCD PI can be performed non-invasively serially, helping to rule in high ICP, and prompting more invasive, continuous modalities. Confounders can make PI uninterpretable for raised ICP. Lack of pulsatile flow, such as with venous–arterial (V–A) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), as systolic and diastolic ratios for pulsatility index would be uninterpretable for ICP and brain death. The diagnosis of vasospasm by TCD would also be more difficult given the lower flow states associated with non-pulsatile flow from an LVAD or V–A ECMO (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7

Disadvantage to transcranial Doppler when interpreting MCA flows for patient with non-pulsatile flow states (i.e., V–A ECMO, LVAD). a Normal pulsatile flow: systolic upstroke with normal step-down of diastolic flow. b Non-pulsatile flow: Loss of sharp systolic peak flows, with overall lowering of means flows—which would make interpretation of pulsatility index for ICP as well as mean flows for vasospasm more difficult

Cerebral circulatory arrest

Predictable, step-wise changes in cerebral blood flow may be observed as part of progression to cerebral circulatory arrest (Fig. 6): decreasing or blunted diastolic flow, oscillating flow (characterized by diastolic flow reversal), sharp systolic peak flows, and then finally, zero flow in keeping with cerebral circulatory arrest [10, 15].

Serial interrogations are often required for TCD diagnosis of cerebral circulatory arrest and brain death, including a scan preceding the onset of cerebral circulatory arrest to demonstrate the presence of prior intra-cranial flow [15, 6567]. Cerebral circulatory arrest may be identified on TCD (red box of Fig. 6) when one of three criteria are met in bilateral blood vessels, measured at least twice, 30 min apart: (1) Net-zero oscillating waveform flow with near equal systolic forward flow and diastolic reversed flow. (2) Small sharp systolic peaks with < 50 cm/s peak systolic velocity and < 200 ms duration. (3) Disappearance of all previously seen intra-cranial flow, but extra-cranial flow still present [30, 65]. These criteria (listed in Table 2) have a sensitivity of 88%, and specificity of 98% [30].
Table 2

Cerebral circulatory arrest criteria by transcranial Doppler

Oscillating wave form (equal systolic forward flow and diastolic reversed flow)

Small systolic spikes of < 200 ms duration and < 50 cm/s pulse systolic velocity spike

Disappearance of all intra-cranial flow (loss of systolic and diastolic flow, where flow had been present previously intra-cranially, and still present extra-cranially)

Determination of brain death is typically a clinical diagnosis with parameters like brainstem reflex testing and an apnea test. Certain situations (i.e., presence of spinal reflexes, drug ingestions, and profound hypothermia/shock) may lead to confounding with brain death determination if relying on clinical testing alone. If TCD rules in cerebral circulatory arrest by non-reassuring MCA flows, ancillary testing (4-vessel cerebral angiography, nuclear medicine radionuclide brain perfusion scan, CT or MR cerebral blood flow angiography) could be sought to formally confirm the diagnosis. However, if TCD shows reassuring cerebral blood flows not meeting aforementioned criteria, this would possibly save premature, unnecessary serial ancillary tests, until the diagnosis can be first confirmed on TCD. This helps optimizing the ideal time to obtain ancillary testing when clinical determination of brain death has confounders [6570].

Cerebral circulatory arrest: limitations

In addition to previously discussed limitations in other sections, there are specific limitations to TCD diagnosis of brain death. Despite the presence of reassuring spectral Doppler waveforms, a patient can still qualify as brain dead by other clinical means (brainstem and apnea testing in the absence of confounders). This means cerebral blood flow maybe inadequate to sustain life despite reassuring waveforms. The opposite is also true, as the absence of reassuring spectral Doppler waveforms (meeting above criteria) does not automatically mean brain death, as TCD evaluates cerebral circulatory arrest, not brainstem function. Furthermore, most medical jurisdictions will not accept a TCD as its own ancillary test to confirm brain death [67].

Conclusions

The advent of intensivist-performed ultrasound and availability of ultrasound machines now provides a unique climate where point-of-care TCD is a reality. Intensivists with this skill are able to provide immediate, 24/7 bedside assessment for midline shift, elevated ICP, vasospasm and intra-cranial hypertension progression. Barriers to training do still exist, but despite these pitfalls and limitations, intensivists performing limited point-of-care TCD as a screening tool to rule-in certain indications is feasible. Reaching competence is attainable, without extensive formal radiology training for diagnostic TCD. Much like many other POC modalities, to rule in various pathologies where prompt bedside diagnosis could be invaluable to the expedition of patient care. We support the use of TCD as a complementary adjunct to routine investigations (formal TCD, CT/MRI, ICP monitors).

Abbreviations

TCD: 

transcranial Doppler

CT: 

computerized tomography

CT-A: 

computerized tomography-angiogram

MRI: 

magnetic resonance imaging

MCA: 

middle cerebral artery

ICP: 

intra-cranial pressure

ICA: 

internal carotid artery

SAH: 

subarachnoid hemorrhage

IVH: 

intra-ventricular hemorrhage

ICH: 

intra-cranial hemorrhage

EVD: 

extra-ventricular drain

POC: 

point-of-care

GCS: 

Glasgow Coma Scale

TBI: 

traumatic brain injury

ICU: 

intensive care unit

PaCO2

pressure in arterial blood of carbon dioxide

PEA: 

pulseless electrical activity

CPR: 

cardio-pulmonary resuscitation

ROSC: 

return of spontaneous circulation

DNR: 

do not resuscitate

PPV: 

positive predictive value

MLS: 

midline shift

CPP: 

cerebral perfusion pressure

PI: 

pulsatility index

PSV: 

peak systolic velocity

ESV: 

end-diastolic velocity

MV: 

mean velocity

ABP: 

arterial blood pressure

MAP: 

mean arterial pressure

ONSD: 

optic nerve sheath diameter

V-A ECMO: 

venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

LVAD: 

left ventricular assist device

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

VL carried out the conception and design of the review article, the review of the literature, collection of the majority of the cases, image acquisition and drafting/revisions of the manuscript. RA help conceived of the study, and participated in image acquisition of several cases and helped to draft the manuscript while revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Lauren Zarnett (neurosurgery resident at Western University) for her contribution to the cases and her continued support for the TCD modality.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of supporting data

Any additional supporting data for this manuscript are provided either in the Additional file section. Any further supporting data are available at the request of the journal.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient themselves, or parent/guardian/relative of the patient. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the editor of this journal.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed by local institutional review boards (Western University Research Ethics Board and Lawson Health Research Institute) and received delegated health sciences approval. Written informed consent for participation in acquisition of TCD images was obtained from the patient themselves, or parent/guardian/relative of the patient. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the editor of this journal.

Funding

There is no funding for this project.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University
(2)
London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital Rm

References

  1. Andrews PJD, Piper IR, Dearden NM, Miller JD (1990) Secondary insults during intrahospital transport of head-injured patients. Lancet 335(8685):327–330PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kaups KL, Davis JW, Parks SN (2004) Routinely repeated computed tomography after blunt head trauma: does it benefit patients? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 56(3):475–481View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lieben MA (2000) Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma [Internet].17(6/7) http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/neu.2000.17.479. Cited 16 Jan 2017
  4. Savers S (2000) Guidelines for cerebral perfusion pressure. J Neurotrauma 17(6–7):507–511Google Scholar
  5. Becker DP, Miller JD, Ward JD, Greenberg RP, Young HF, Sakalas R (1977) The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management. J Neurosurg 47(4):491–502PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Aaslid R, Markwalder T-M, Nornes H (1982) Noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasound recording of flow velocity in basal cerebral arteries. J Neurosurg 57(6):769–774PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Radiology AC of, others (2012) AIUM practice guideline for the performance of a transcranial Doppler ultrasound examination for adults and children. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med 31(9):1489Google Scholar
  8. Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA(2016) Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet [Internet]. 2016; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673616306687. Cited 16 Jan 2016
  9. Simm RF, de Aguiar PHP, de Oliveira Lima M, Paiva BL (2013) Transcranial Doppler as a routine in the treatment of vasospasm following subarachanoid hemorrhage (SAH). In: Cerebral vasospasm: neurovascular events after subarachnoid hemorrhage [Internet]. Springer;. pp 75–76. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-7091-1192-5_16. Cited 16 Jan 2017
  10. Bellner J, Romner B, Reinstrup P, Kristiansson K-A, Ryding E, Brandt L (2004) Transcranial Doppler sonography pulsatility index (PI) reflects intracranial pressure (ICP). Surg Neurol 62(1):45–51PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Rasulo FA, De Peri E, Lavinio A (2008) Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in intensive care. Eur J Anaesthesiol 25(S42):167–173View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Rasulo FA, Bertuetti R, Robba C, Lusenti F, Cantoni A, Bernini M et al (2017) The accuracy of transcranial Doppler in excluding intracranial hypertension following acute brain injury: a multicenter prospective pilot study. Crit Care 21(1):44PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Cardim D, Robba C, Donnelly J, Bohdanowicz M, Schmidt B, Damian M et al (2015) Prospective study on noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure in traumatic brain-injured patients: comparison of four methods. J Neurotrauma 33(8):792–802PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Brien NF, Maa T, Reuter-Rice K (2015) Noninvasive screening for intracranial hypertension in children with acute, severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Pediatr 16(4):420–425PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hassler W, Steinmetz H, Pirschel J (1989) Transcranial Doppler study of intracranial circulatory arrest. J Neurosurg 71(2):195–201PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zweifel C, Czosnyka M, Carrera E, de Riva N, Pickard JD, Smielewski P (2012) Reliability of the blood flow velocity pulsatility index for assessment of intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures in head-injured patients. Neurosurgery 71(4):853–861PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Behrens A, Lenfeldt N, Ambarki K, Malm J, Eklund A, Koskinen L-O (2010) Transcranial Doppler pulsatility index: not an accurate method to assess intracranial pressure. Neurosurgery 66(6):1050–1057PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Moppett IK (2004) Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anaesth 93(5):710–724PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. White H, Venkatesh B (2006) Applications of transcranial Doppler in the ICU: a review. Intensive Care Med 32(7):981–994PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Seidel G, Gerriets T, Kaps M, Missler U (1996) Dislocation of the third ventricle due to space-occupying stroke evaluated by transcranial duplex sonography. J Neuroimaging 6(4):227–230PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerriets T, Stolz E, Modrau B, Fiss I, Seidel G, Kaps M (1999) Sonographic monitoring of midline shift in hemispheric infarctions. Neurology 52(1):45–49PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerriets T, Stolz E, König S, Babacan S, Fiss I, Jauss M et al (2001) Sonographic monitoring of midline shift in space-occupying stroke. Stroke 32(2):442–447PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Mayo PH, Beaulieu Y, Doelken P, Feller-Kopman D, Harrod C, Kaplan A et al (2009) American College of Chest Physicians/La Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography. Chest J 135(4):1050–1060View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kincaid MS (2008) Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: a diagnostic tool of increasing utility. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 21(5):552–559View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Quattrocchi KB, Prasad P, Willits NH, Wagner FC (1991) Quantification of midline shift as a predictor of poor outcome following head injury. Surg Neurol 35(3):183–188PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Motuel J, Biette I, Srairi M, Mrozek S, Kurrek MM, Chaynes P, et al (2014) Assessment of brain midline shift using sonography in neurosurgical ICU patients. Crit Care [Internet];18(6). http://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-014-0676-9. Cited 16 Jan 2017
  27. Kiphuth IC, Huttner HB, Struffert T, Schwab S, Köhrmann M (2011) Sonographic monitoring of ventricle enlargement in posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Neurology 76(10):858–862PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tsivgoulis G, Alexandrov AV, Sloan MA (2009) Advances in transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 9(1):46–54PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Schatlo B, Pluta RM (2007) Clinical applications of transcranial Doppler sonography. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2(1):49–57PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Naqvi J, Yap KH, Ahmad G, Ghosh J (2013) Transcranial Doppler ultrasound: a review of the physical principles and major applications in critical care. Int J Vasc Med [Internet] http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijvm/2013/629378/abs/. Cited 16 Jan 2017
  31. Saqqur M, Zygun D, Demchuk A (2007) Role of transcranial Doppler in neurocritical care. Crit Care Med 35(5):S216–S223PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Akif Topcuoglu M (2012) Transcranial Doppler ultrasound in neurovascular diseases: diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. J Neurochem 123(s2):39–51View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJ (2007) Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet 369(9558):306–318PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Bleck TP (1997) Rebleeding and vasospasm after SAH: new strategies for improving outcome. J Crit Illn. 12:572–589Google Scholar
  35. Rigamonti A, Ackery A, Baker AJ (2008) Transcranial Doppler monitoring in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a critical tool in critical care. Can J Anesth 55(2):112–123PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindegaard K-F, Nornes H, Bakke SJ, Sorteberg W, Nakstad P (1989) Cerebral vasospasm diagnosis by means of angiography and blood velocity measurements. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 100(1–2):12–24View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Krejza J, Szydlik P, Liebeskind DS, Kochanowicz J, Bronov O, Mariak Z et al (2005) Age and sex variability and normal reference values for the V(MCA)/V(ICA) index. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26(4):730–735PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mascia L, Fedorko L, terBrugge K, Filippini C, Pizzio M, Ranieri VM et al (2003) The accuracy of transcranial Doppler to detect vasospasm in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intensive Care Med 29(7):1088–1094PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Muñoz-Sanchez MA, Murillo-Cabezas F, Egea-Guerrero JJ, Gascón-Castillo ML, Cancela P, Amaya-Villar R et al (2012) Emergency transcranial Doppler ultrasound: predictive value for the development of symptomatic vasospasm in spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients in good neurological condition. Med Intensiva 36(9):611–618PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Wozniak MA, Sloan MA, Rothman MI, Burch CM, Rigamonti D, Permutt T et al (1996) Detection of vasospasm by transcranial Doppler sonography. J Neuroimaging 6(2):87–93PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Caricato A, Pitoni S, Montini L, Bocci MG, Annetta P, Antonelli M (2014) Echography in brain imaging in intensive care unit: state of the art. World J Radiol 6(9):636PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Vora YY, Suarez-Almazor M, Steinke DE, Martin ML, Findlay JM (1999) Role of transcranial Doppler monitoring in the diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 44(6):1237–1247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Toi H, Matsumoto N, Yokosuka K, Matsubara S, Hirano K, Uno M (2013) Prediction of cerebral vasospasm using early stage transcranial Doppler. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 53(6):396–402View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Sloan MA, Alexandrov AV, Tegeler CH, Spencer MP, Caplan LR, Feldmann E et al (2004) Assessment: transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: report of the therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 62(9):1468–1481PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Alexandrov AV, Sloan MA, Tegeler CH, Newell DN, Lumsden A, Garami Z et al (2012) Practice standards for transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound. part II. clinical indications and expected outcomes. J Neuroimaging Off J Am Soc Neuroimaging 22(3):215–224View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Connolly ES, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, Derdeyn CP, Dion J, Higashida RT et al (2012) Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 43(6):1711–1737PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Marinoni M, Ginanneschi A, Forleo P, Amaducci L (1997) Technical limits in transcranial Doppler recording: inadquate acoustic windows. Ultrasound Med Biol 23(8):1275–1277PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Baumgartner RW (1999) Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography. J Neurol 246(8):637–647PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Vollmer DG, Torner JC, Jane JA, Sadovnic B, Charlebois D, Eisenberg HM et al (1991) Age and outcome following traumatic coma: why do older patients fare worse? Spec Suppl 75(1S):S37–S49Google Scholar
  50. Graham DI, Adams JH, Gennarelli TA (1993) Pathology of brain damage in head injury. Head Inj.91–113Google Scholar
  51. Chan K-H, Miller JD, Dearden NM, Andrews PJ, Midgley S (1992) The effect of changes in cerebral perfusion pressure upon middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and jugular bulb venous oxygen saturation after severe brain injury. J Neurosurg 77(1):55–61PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosenfeld JV, Maas AI, Bragge P, Morganti-Kossmann MC, Manley GT, Gruen RL (2012) Early management of severe traumatic brain injury. Lancet 380(9847):1088–1098PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Klingelhöfer J, Conrad B, Benecke R, Sander D (1987) Intracranial flow patterns at increasing intracranial pressure. Klin Wochenschr 65(12):542–545PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Klingelhöfer J, Conrad B, Benecke R, Sander D, Markakis E (1988) Evaluation of intracranial pressure from transcranial Doppler studies in cerebral disease. J Neurol 235(3):159–162PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Homburg A-M, Jakobsen M, Enevoldsen E (1993) Transcranial Doppler recordings in raised intracranial pressure. Acta Neurol Scand 87(6):488–493PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Varsos GV, Richards H, Kasprowicz M, Budohoski KP, Brady KM, Reinhard M et al (2013) Critical closing pressure determined with a model of cerebrovascular impedance. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 33(2):235–243PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Czosnyka M, Matta BF, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick PJ, Pickard JD (1998) Cerebral perfusion pressure in head-injured patients: a noninvasive assessment using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. J Neurosurg 88(5):802–808PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Cardim D, Schmidt B, Robba C, Donnelly J, Puppo C, Czosnyka M et al (2017) Transcranial Doppler monitoring of intracranial pressure plateau waves. Neurocrit Care 26(3):330–338PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. de Riva N, Budohoski KP, Smielewski P, Kasprowicz M, Zweifel C, Steiner LA et al (2012) Transcranial Doppler pulsatility index: what it is and what it isn’t. Neurocrit Care 17(1):58–66PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Figaji AA, Zwane E, Fieggen AG, Siesjo P, Peter JC (2009) Transcranial Doppler pulsatility index is not a reliable indicator of intracranial pressure in children with severe traumatic brain injury. Surg Neurol 72(4):389–394PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Hanlo PW, Gooskens RHJM, Nijhuis IJM, Faber JAJ, Peters RJA, van Huffelen AC et al (1995) Value of transcranial Doppler indices in predicting raised ICP in infantile hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst. 11(10):595–603PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Rainov NG, Weise JB, Burkert W (2000) Transcranial Doppler sonography in adult hydrocephalic patients. Neurosurg Rev 23(1):34–38PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Cardim D, Robba C, Bohdanowicz M, Donnelly J, Cabella B, Liu X et al (2016) Non-invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: is it possible? Neurocrit Care 25(3):473–491PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Cardim D, Robba C, Donnelly J, Bohdanowicz M, Schmidt B, Damian M et al (2015) Prospective study on noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure in traumatic brain-injured patients: comparison of four methods. J Neurotrauma 33(8):792–802PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Monteiro LM, Bollen CW, van Huffelen AC, Ackerstaff RG, Jansen NJ, van Vught AJ (2006) Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography to confirm brain death: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 32(12):1937–1944PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Kuo JR, Chen CF, Chio CC, Chang CH, Wang CC, Yang CM et al (2006) Time dependent validity in the diagnosis of brain death using transcranial Doppler sonography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(5):646–649PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Chassé M, Glen P, Doyle M-A, McIntyre L, English SW, Knoll G et al (2013) Ancillary testing for diagnosis of brain death: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2(1):1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Dosemeci L, Dora B, Yilmaz M, Cengiz M, Balkan S, Ramazanoglu A (2004) Utility of transcranial doppler ultrasonography for confirmatory diagnosis of brain death: two sides of the coin. Transplantation 77(1):71–75PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Poularas J, Karakitsos D, Kouraklis G, Kostakis A, De Groot E, Kalogeromitros A, et al (2006) Comparison between transcranial color Doppler ultrasonography and angiography in the confirmation of brain death. In: Transplantation proceedings [Internet]. Elsevier. pp 1213–1217. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004113450600217X Cited 16 Jan 2017
  70. De Freitas GR, Andre C (2006) Sensitivity of transcranial Doppler for confirming brain death: a prospective study of 270 cases. Acta Neurol Scand 113(6):426–432PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017