Skip to main content

Table 3 Linear coefficient and Pearson correlation coefficient of each hemidiaphragm motion measured by fluoroscopy, area change, resting (end expiratory) thickness and thickening fraction compared to spirometry results

From: Replacement of fluoroscopy by ultrasonography in the evaluation of hemidiaphragm function, an exploratory prospective study

Both hemidiaphragms

Lateral views

Linear regression

Pearson correlation coefficient

Coef.

Std.

t

p-value

95% CI

FEV1

        

 Left hemidiaphragm

Fluoroscopy

0.28

0.07

3.76

0.001

0.13

0.43

0.7369

Ultrasonography

0.04

0.01

2.81

0.01

0.01

0.07

0.5285

 Right hemidiaphragm

Fluoroscopy

0.20

0.07

2.64

0.01

0.04

0.35

0.4575

Ultrasonography

0.02

0.01

2.73

0.01

0.01

0.04

0.4598

FVC

        

 Left hemidiaphragm

Fluoroscopy

0.31

0.08

3.86

0.001

0.15

0.48

0.7332

Ultrasonography

0.05

0.01

4.13

0.001

0.03

0.08

0.6913

 Right hemidiaphragm

Fluoroscopy

0.19

0.08

2.27

0.03

0.02

0.36

0.3992

Ultrasonography

0.02

0.01

2.75

0.01

0.01

0.04

0.4731

FEV1

        

 Left hemidiaphragm

Resting thickness

− 6.75

3.78

− 1.79

0.09

− 14.5

1.03

− 0.34

Thickening fraction

− 0.96

1.08

− 0.89

0.38

− 3.17

1.26

− 0.17

 Right hemidiaphragm

Resting thickness

− 0.63

2.77

− 0.23

0.82

− 6.31

5.05

0.01

Thickening fraction

0.04

0.77

0.05

0.96

− 1.54

1.62

− 0.0428

FEV

        

 Left hemidiaphragm

Resting thickness

− 6.01

4.31

− 1.40

0.18

− 14.9

2.86

− 0.2796

Thickening fraction

− 0.30

1.22

− 0.24

0.81

− 2.80

2.21

− 0.0552

 Right hemidiaphragm

Resting thickness

− 1.41

3.02

− 0.47

0.64

− 7.60

4.78

− 0.0715

Thickening fraction

− 0.32

0.84

− 0.38

0.71

− 2.04

1.41

− 0.0507

  1. CI Confidence interval, FEV1 Forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC Forced vital capacity, Std. Standard deviation