Acute scrotal ultrasound: a practical guide
© Springer-Verlag 2010
Received: 15 June 2010
Accepted: 23 October 2010
Published: 11 November 2010
The purpose of this article is to provide a practical review of common ultrasound (US) findings in patients presenting with acute scrotal pain.
We performed a literature search and reviewed numerous US cases archived in the radiology department of a large university hospital to find examples that illustrate the common US findings encountered in acute scrotal pain.
We reviewed the literature and provided several practical examples of common US findings in patients presenting with acute scrotal pain.
Scrotal US plays a pivotal role in the evaluation of acute scrotal pain and allows proper triage of patients for conservative, medical, or surgical management due to its ability to rapidly differentiate intra versus extratesticular pathology, determine extent of trauma, and assess parenchymal perfusion.
KeywordsUltrasound Scrotum Acute Pain Trauma
The evaluation of acute scrotal pain can be challenging for the clinician initially examining and triaging the patient. Acute scrotal conditions due to traumatic, infectious, vascular, or neoplastic etiologies can all present with pain as the initial complaint. Additionally, the laboratory and physical examination findings in such conditions may overlap; this, coupled with potential patient guarding and lack of cooperativity, may result in a limited, non-specific physical examination. Therefore, scrotal ultrasound has emerged to play a pivotal role in the evaluation of the patient presenting with acute scrotal pain. Newer US platforms and linear-array transducers have evolved to allow high-resolution imaging of the scrotum and its contents. Additionally, a thorough US examination should also include evaluation of nearby structures in the proper clinical setting; examples include scanning of the perineum and base of the penis in cases of suspected infection/abscess resulting in referred pain to the scrotum, and scanning of the inguinal canal in cases of suspected hernia.
High-resolution imaging of the scrotum is especially important for evaluating small scrotal structures which were previously difficult to differentiate with earlier platforms; an example is the tunic albuginea, where early detection of a focal defect can allow diagnosis of testicular rupture and will facilitate prompt surgical intervention resulting in improved testis salvage rates . The performance of scrotal US in the trauma setting is emphasized as the amount of soft tissue swelling, ecchymosis, and hematoma does not always correlate with the degree of testicular injury.
The use of color and duplex Doppler ultrasound is unsurpassed in differentiating several acute scrotal conditions, such as epididymo-orchitis, torsion, and infarction. The addition of gray scale ultrasound can be used to help determine if a testis has undergone necrosis and is no longer salvageable.
In addition to its ability to often allow a specific diagnosis, another strength of scrotal US is its speed and portability. Finally, the lack of ionizing radiation makes US a safe, effective means of examining the scrotum. In this article, we provide a pictorial summary of some of the more common etiologies resulting in acute scrotal pain.
Normal scrotal anatomy
Scrotal US technique
Scrotal sonography is performed with the patient in the supine position with the scrotum supported by a folded towel placed between the thighs or a rolled towel draped over the thighs. The penis should be displaced superolaterally and covered with a towel. A high-frequency, linear-array transducer (8–15 MHz) is utilized to image the testes and scrotal contents in the longitudinal and transverse orientations. A higher frequency transducer is preferred to increase resolution and conspicuity of thin structures, such as the tunica albuginia although in the setting of acute swelling, scrotal edema, or large scrotal fluid collections a lower frequency transducer may be necessary to provide adequate depth of imaging. The testes and epididymides are compared for size and echogenicity and in the setting of unilateral symptoms, gray scale scan parameters should be optimized on the normal side. Scrotal skin thickness should also be assessed.
Color Doppler is a critical component of scrotal sonography in the acute setting. Color Doppler parameters should be optimized for detection of low flow velocities. This includes utilizing an appropriately low pulse repetition frequency, increasing the Doppler gain to a level slightly below the point at which excessive flash artifact and noise is encountered, and using a low wall filter. As with gray scale images, Doppler parameters should be optimized on the asymptomatic side prior to a side-to-side comparison. A transverse image including simultaneous color Doppler interrogation of portions of both testes can facilitate this comparison. Spectral Doppler can be utilized to document intratesticular arterial flow, confirming that apparent color Doppler flow is not artifactual. Power Doppler increases the sensitivity for detection of slow flow though is more susceptible to patient motion which can be an issue when scanning the patient with an acute scrotum. The patient can perform a Valsalva maneuver, while interrogating with color Doppler to facilitate evaluation of venous structures within the spermatic cord including evaluation for varicoceles when necessary.
US findings in acute scrotal trauma
Testicular trauma is a common cause of acute scrotal pain. Blunt trauma is the most common mechanism of injury, and is often due to physical assault, motor vehicle accidents, or athletic injuries. Penetrating scrotal injuries are less common, and are potentially due to stab wounds, projectile injuries or bites. Physical examination may be limited due to pain and often reveals varying degrees of edema and ecchymosis that may not correlate with the severity of injury . US has become a pivotal tool in accurately assessing the extent of injury and vascular integrity thereby allowing prompt triage and management.
Blunt and penetrating scrotal trauma can result in testicular rupture and/or fracture, intra- and extra-testicular hematomas, hematoceles, hydroceles, and intratesticular pseudoaneurysms. Scrotal and epididymal hematomas, epididymal fracture and rupture, and traumatic epididymitis can also occur.
Testicular rupture and fracture
Guichard et al.  reported a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 65% for US in the detection of testicular rupture when comparing US findings of testicular rupture with surgical findings. In their study, US criteria used to diagnose testicular rupture included a hypoechoic, heterogenous testicular parenchyma, a testicular contour abnormality, and localization of the breach in the tunica albuginea . Another study reported a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93.5% based on ultrasound findings of heterogeneous testicular echotexture and loss of contour definition only .
It has long been reported that conservative management in cases of contusion or rupture of the testis has resulted in a high rate of delayed orchiectomy [6, 7]. Currently, early surgical exploration has now become the standard of care. Surgical exploration should not be delayed if the US findings are normal or equivocal, yet the physical examination findings are suggestive of testicular damage . Early surgical repair of rupture is associated with testicular salvage rates higher than 80% . Additional benefits include faster resolution of pain, hemostasis, and preservation of spermatogenesis . Delay in diagnosis and intervention may result in testicular atrophy, ischemia/infarction, abscess, delayed orchiectomy, and loss of spermatogenesis [2, 9].
A break or linear band of discontinuity within the testicular parenchyma is illustrative of a testicular fracture. Ultrasound will show a linear hypoechoic and avascular fracture line within the testis which may also coexist with rupture of the tunica albuginea (Fig. 2b) . Management often consists of debridement along the avascular fracture line, while preserving the vascular parenchyma.
Hematomas, hematocele, and hydrocele
Scrotal trauma often results in hematomas which may be intratesticular or extratesticular, such as within the scrotal wall . The US appearance of the hematoma depends on its age. Acute hematomas may appear hyperechoic and become hypoechoic to anechoic over time. Color Doppler signal within a suspected hematoma should raise concern for active hemorrhage or neoplasm . Management of intratesticular hematomas largely depends on their size; small hematomas without evidence of rupture or fracture are treated conservatively, whereas large hematomas warrant surgical exploration and drainage due to elevated intratesticular pressure and the risk of progressive pressure necrosis and testicular atrophy .
Hematocele represents accumulation of blood between the tunica albuginea and tunica vaginalis, and is a common finding after blunt scrotal trauma (Fig. 2a). The US appearance varies with the age of the hematocele. Acute hematoceles are echogenic, while chronic hematoceles become anechoic over time and develop internal septa and loculations . Chronic hematoceles may become calcified. Acute onset of large hematoceles may cause reduced blood flow to the testis and may mimic testicular torsion. Even in the setting of normal testicular blood flow, surgical exploration of an acute large hematocele is warranted to evaluate for occult testicular rupture. Small hematoceles without evidence of rupture may be managed conservatively.
Similar to hematoceles, hydroceles refer to fluid which accumulates between the tunica albuginea and tunica vaginalis. However, rupture of the bulbous portion of the urethra may cause extravasation of urine into the scrotum which will mimic a hydrocele .
Bullet fragments, foreign bodies, and intrascrotal gas can be shown with US in the setting of penetrating injury. Most foreign projectiles are echogenic at US and will produce marked shadowing and distortion of the beam; gas is shown as multiple small echogenic foci with posterior reverberation or ‘dirty shadowing’ (Fig. 2c). Transection of the spermatic cord can be detected at US as hematoma and findings of testicular ischemia . In a study by Cline et al. , 29 out of 30 patients underwent surgical exploration due to scrotal gunshot or stab wounds with evidence of deep scrotal injury, and the most common injuries were unilateral fractured testis and transection of the spermatic cord. Management of penetrating deep scrotal injuries generally includes immediate surgical exploration.
US findings in non-traumatic acute scrotal conditions
Epididymitis and epididymo-orchitis
Epididymitis and epididymo-orchitis are common causes for acute scrotal pain with approximately 600,000 cases per year in the United States. Occurring most commonly in adolescents and young adults, epididymitis has a prevalence of 14–28% . Orchitis develops in 20–40% of epididymitis due to contiguous spread of infection . Isolated orchitis is rare and most often associated with mumps. In adolescents, most cases of epididymitis are attributed to ascending sexually transmitted diseases, with Chlamydia trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae the most common pathogens. In those younger than 14 and older than 35 the disease is generally caused by common urinary tract pathogens .
Clinically, epididymo-orchitis presents as acute scrotal pain localized to the posterior testis. Symptoms of lower urinary tract infection may be present, a finding that is common in epididymitis, but not torsion . The Prehn sign, defined as relief of pain with elevation of the testes over the symphysis pubis, may be elicited in patients with epididymitis, further distinguishing it from torsion.
Typical gray scale US findings of epididymitis consist of an enlarged hypoechoic epididymis with parenchymal heterogeneity due to edema and hemorrhage . Concomitant orchitis is characterized by an enlarged, heterogeneous testis, although findings may be focal or diffuse. When focal, orchitis is most often located adjacent to an inflamed epididymis. Associated findings of epididymo-orchitis may include skin thickening and reactive hydrocele .
If incompletely treated, epididymo-orchitis can lead to abscess formation. This may manifest clinically as persistent fevers, elevated white cell count, and development of a palpable scrotal abnormality. Whether intratesticular or paratesticular, US findings typically include a well-defined, ovoid, or rounded mass in the scrotum with variable internal echogenicity due to the ratio of fluid, purulent debris, and gas (Fig. 3b). Application of color Doppler will show an avascular mass with variable flow in the abscess rim and surrounding soft tissues. Follow-up US after incision and drainage or antibiotic therapy will allow assessment of resolution of any fluid collections.
Infection from epididymo-orchitis can spread retrograde via the vas deferens, resulting in deferentitis or vasitis. As the vas deferens extend from the seminal vesicles to the epididymes via the inguinal canal, infection can extend into the peritoneum and be a cause of pelvic pain or referred pain to the scrotum. Therefore, a thorough scrotal US examination should include evaluation of the inguinal region to evaluate the spermatic cord and to assess for indirect inguinal hernia. Physical examination findings in the setting of vasitis can include a firm, tender structure lateral to the testis with extension to an indurated, tender inguinal region due to inflammation, and infiltration along the spermatic cord. US findings mimic those on physical examination and include a thickened hypoechoic, hyperemic spermatic cord with inflammation and phlegmon lateral to the testis (Fig. 3c). Vasitis is commonly unilateral, but can be bilateral. Treatment is similar to epididymitis, and includes antibiotics and analgesia.
Lesions in the inguinal canal
Scrotal US may include evaluation of the perineum in a patient presenting with pain and infectious symptoms; additionally, obtunded patients should also undergo imaging evaluation of the perineum, especially those who have been incapacitated for an indeterminate length of time and those in whom there is clinical suspicion for diabetic coma. A scrotal US examination which includes only the scrotum may miss life-threatening infection or perineal abscess. To properly scan for perineal infection, the US technologist may have to reposition the patient so that the perineum is exposed; it may be necessary for the technologist or patient to retract the scrotum from the field of view.
Vascular etiologies of acute scrotal pain
US plays a pivotal role in differentiating acute torsion from epididymo-orchitis. While loss of the cremasteric reflex and absence of Prehn’s are physical examination findings of torsion, there can be overlap on physical examination as both entities present with scrotal tenderness and swelling [22, 23]. Additionally, while most cases of torsion involve younger males, torsion can occur at any age. The degree of venous engorgement, edema, hemorrhage, and arterial compromise depends on the degree of torsion; studies have shown that there must be at least 720 torsions for occlusion of the testicular artery . The degree of testicular ischemia depends on the degree and length of torsion. If diagnosed in the first 6 h, torsion can be successfully treated surgically in nearly 100% of cases; the salvage rate drops to approximately 20% between 12 and 24 h after diagnosis . In adolescents and adults, torsion occurs within the tunica vaginalis due to lack of attachment of the tunica to the posterolateral aspect of the testis; this results in the so-called “Bell-clapper” deformity and allows the testis to be mobile and rotate freely. Torsion can also be iatrogenic in the setting of spermatic cord manipulation or post-herniorrhaphy. Approximately, 8% of cases of testicular torsion are post-traumatic, presumably due to forceful contraction of the cremasteric muscle and testicular rotation [11, 26, 27]. Extravaginal torsion occurs outside of the tunica vaginalis due to non-fixation of the testes and gubernacula; this type of torsion occurs exclusively in newborns and the testis is typically infracted at birth. US findings will include lack of color flow, parenchymal heterogeneity, and hydrocele.
Torsion can also affect the appendages of the testis and epididymis. Patients typically present with gradual pain and may manifest with a firm bluish nodule at the superior aspect of the testis referred to as the “blue dot” sign. US will show a circular mass adjacent to the testis or epididymis which may show peripheral increased flow on color Doppler examination; reactive hydrocele and skin thickening may also be shown .
Testicular tumors rarely present with acute pain; rather, patients may describe a vague discomfort or palpable abnormality. US findings are variable due to tumor type, but typically include a solid parenchymal mass with internal flow. Similarly, most varicoceles do not cause acute pain. Most varicoceles can be diagnosed clinically and are idiopathic. Typical color Doppler US findings include dilated veins which are accentuated with Valsalva maneuver. While most varicoceles are idiopathic, evaluation of the retroperitoneum should be performed if a varicocele is new, right sided or non-decompressible due to the potential of a retroperitoneal mass.
Thorough evaluation of the acute scrotum requires obtaining a detailed history and performing a careful physical examination. As the physical examination can be non-specific and potentially limited, US has emerged to play a pivotal role in the evaluation of the acute scrotum. The speed, portability, and lack of radiation make US the imaging modality of choice in this setting. A properly performed US examination can allow a specific diagnosis in most cases and facilitate triage and management of patients with acute scrotal pain.
Conflict of interest
- Bhatt S, Dogra V (2008) Role of US in testicular and scrotal trauma. Radiographics 28:1617–1629PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morey AF, Rozanski TA (2007) Chapter 83 genital and lower urinary tract trauma. In: Wein A (ed) Campbell–Walsh urology, 9th edn. Elsevier, New York, pp 2652–2654Google Scholar
- Deurdulian C, Mittelstaedt CA et al (2007) US of acute scrotal trauma: optimal technique, imaging findings, and management. Radiographics 27:357–369PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guichard G, El Ammari J, Del Coro C et al (2008) Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of testicular rupture after blunt scrotal trauma. Urology 71:52–56PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Buckley JC, McAninch JW (2006) Use of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of testicular injuries in blunt scrotal trauma. J Urol 175:175–178PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cass AS (1983) Testicular trauma. J Urol 129(2):299–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cass AS, Luxenberg M (1988) Value of early operation in blunt testicular contusion with hematocele. J Urol 139(4):746–747PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buckley JC, McAninch JW (2006) Diagnosis and management of testicular ruptures. Urol Clin N Am 33:111–116View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Siegel MJ (1997) The acute scrotum. Radiol Clin North Am 35(4):959–976PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whittenberg AF, Tobias T, Rzeszotarski M, Minotti AJ (2006) Sonography of the acute scrotum: the four T’s of testicular imaging. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 35(1):12–21View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dogra V, Bhatt S (2004) Acute painful scrotum. Radiol Clin N Am 42:349–363PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cline KJ, Mata JA, Venable DD, Eastham JA (1998) Penetrating trauma to the male external genitalia. J Trauma 44(3):492–494PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baldisserotto M (2009) Scrotal emergencies. Pediatr Radiol 39(5):516–521PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dogra V (2003) Sonography of the scrotum. Radiology 227:18–36PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luker GD (1994) Color Doppler sonography of the scrotum in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:649–655PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trojian TH, Lishnak TS, Heiman D (2009) Epididymitis and orchitis: an overview. Am Fam Physician 79(7):583–587PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carkaci S, Ozkan E, Lane D, Yang WT (2010) Scrotal sonography revisited. J Clin Ultrasound 38(1):21–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Middleton WD, Siegel BA, Melson GL, Yates CK, Andriole GL (1990) Acute scrotal disorders: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and testicular scintigraphy. Radiology 177(1):177–181PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanders LM, Haber S, Dembner A, Aquino A (1994) Significance of reversal of diagnostic flow in acute scrotum. J Ultrasound Med 13(2):137–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bissada NK, Redman JF (1976) Unusual masses in the spermatic cord: report of six cases and review of the literature. South Med J 69(11):1410–1412PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vick R, Carson CC III (1999) Fournier’s disease. Urol Clin N Am 26:841–849View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noske HD, Kraus SW, Altinkilic BM, Weidner W (1998) Historical milestones regarding torsion of the scrotal organs. J Urol 159:13–16PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rabinowitz R (1984) The importance of the cremasteric reflex in acute scrotal swelling in children. J Urol 132:89–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herbener TE (1996) Ultrasound in the assessment of the acute scrotum. J Clin Ultrasound 24:405–421PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patriquin HB, Yazbeck S, Trinh B et al (1993) Testicular torsion in infants and children: diagnosis with Doppler sonography. Radiology 188:781–785PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lrhorfi H, Manunta A, Rodriguez A, Lobel B (2002) Trauma induced testicular torsion. J Urol 168:2548PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seng YJ, Moissinac K (2000) Trauma induced testicular torsion: a reminder for the unwary. J Accid Emerg Med 17:381–382PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burks DD, Markey BJ, Burkhard TK, Balsara ZN, Haluszka MM, Canning DA (1990) Suspected testicular torsion and ischemia: evaluation with color Doppler sonography. Radiology 175:815–821PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barth RA, Shortliffe LD (1997) Normal pediatric testis: comparison of power Doppler and color Doppler US in the detection of blood flow. Radiology 204:389–393PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Horstman WG (1997) Scrotal imaging. Urol Clin N Am 24:653–671View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Middleton WD, Middleton MA, Dierks M, Keetch D, Dierks S (1997) Sonographic prediction of viability in testicular torsion: preliminary observations. J Ultrasound Med 16:23–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin EP, Bhatt S, Rubens DJ, Dogra VS (2007) Testicular torsion: twists and turns. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 28:317–328PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar