Emergency department ultrasonography guided long-axis antecubital intravenous cannulation: How to do it
© Riley and Garcia; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 6 March 2012
Accepted: 16 April 2012
Published: 16 April 2012
An 85-year-old woman with a past medical history of severe peripheral vascular disease and right below knee amputation presented to the emergency department with a 1-day history of non-positional dizziness and weakness. The patient required intravenous access to work up her dizziness and weakness. The patient had multiple failed blind ED peripheral IV attempts performed in the past. Emergency department bedside ultrasonography with a high frequency linear array vascular probe was used to guide antecubital brachial vein cannulation on the first attempt using the long-axis approach.
Keywordsultrasound ultrasonography antecubital brachial vein long-axis vein cannulation.
Emergency department patients who have failed peripheral IV access attempts often need intravenous fluids, blood, and medications necessitating the need for ultrasound guided peripheral vein catheterization [1–16]. One method for obtaining antecubital venous access in the emergency department is by blindly cannulating the antecubital vein using landmark anatomy and palpation to guide proper position. Each needle pass through the skin and into the patient carries additional risk of complications. Antecubital venous access procedures can be complicated by brachial artery punctures, hematoma formation, brachial nerve injury, severe arm pain post procedure, and catheter malposition [4, 5, 7, 11]. Chinnock reported acute antecubital line complications of antecubital artery puncture in 4% of cases, arm numbness in 3% of cases, and severe arm pain in 7% of cases . In addition, Keyes reported the complications of brachial artery puncture in 2% of cases, and that the IV catheter fell out or was infiltrated within 1 h of placement occur in 8% of emergency department patients with antecubital lines . Multiple catheterization attempts can also lead to upper extremity deep venous thrombosis and increase the blood hemolysis rates [6, 8]. Blind cannulation of the antecubital vein increases the rate of complications [4, 5, 7, 11].
Additional file 1: Emergency department ultrasonography guided long-axis antecubital intravenous cannulation-part 1. Introduction, equipment needed, and contraindications for placing an ultrasound guided antecubital intravenous catheter. (MOV )
Ultrasonography can detect anatomic variations, valves, and exact vessel location prior to cannulation. An antecubital vein with preexisting thrombus can also be avoided, and an antecubital vein with atypical anatomy can be identified, and an appropriate ultrasound guided plan for cannulation can be made [4, 5, 7, 11, 15]. Their anatomic detail can be better visualized with the long-axis evaluation of the antecubital vessel.
Making the antecubital vein as large as possible increases the chances of cannulating the vessel on the first attempt. Two tourniquets were placed around the patient's upper arm as he isometrically squeezed his fist. Witting has shown that patients with antecubital veins measured less than 4 mm (they did not specify external vs. internal diameter vein measurements) had a 61% overall ultrasound guided antecubital catheterization failure rate . Although Blaivas et al. have shown that novice ultrasound users were able to obtain vascular access faster using the short-axis approach in a vascular phantom model , Sierzenski et al. and Stone et al. have shown in vascular phantom models that novice ultrasound users had improved accuracy of identifying the needle tip with a long-axis ultrasound transducer orientation [13, 16]. The ability to visualize the needle tip with the long-axis view may be critical for antecubital vein cannulation on the first attempt.
The United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has endorsed the use of ultrasound to guide the placement of central venous catheters to lessen the frequency of complications . There is a critical need to determine if ultrasound used real time for long-axis evaluation of the needle entering the antecubital vessel can result in more successful first attempt antecubital vein cannulations with fewer complications compared to the ultrasound guided short-axis method where the needle is more difficult to visualize entering the antecubital vein [6, 7, 11].
An 85-year-old woman with a past medical history of severe peripheral vascular disease and right below knee amputation presented to the emergency department with a 1-day history of non-positional dizziness and weakness. She denied any headache, neck pain, chest pain, trauma, or fever. Her ED vital signs were normal, and her ECG showed normal sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 91 bpm. Her physical examination was normal including a right below knee stump that was clean and dry. An MRI/MRA of the head and neck showed no new changes. The patient required intravenous access to work up her dizziness and weakness. The patient had multiple failed blind ED peripheral IV attempts performed in the past.
Additional file 2: Emergency department ultrasonography guided long-axis antecubital intravenous cannulation-part 2. Demonstration of initial short-axis probe positioning and transitioning to a long-axis approach to the antecubital vein. Augmentation technique demonstrated to confirm that the blood vessel is a vein. (MOV )
Additional file 3: Emergency department ultrasonography guided long-axis antecubital intravenous cannulation-part 3. Demonstration of placing the needle catheter with ultrasound long-axis guidance into the antecubital vein with good blood flow. (MOV )
Emergency department bedside ultrasonography with a high frequency linear array vascular probe can be used to guide antecubital brachial vein cannulation on the first attempt using the long-axis approach.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
DR is the director of Emergency Ultrasonography and Ultrasound Research at the Emergency Medicine Department, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
SG is an emergency medicine resident in the New York Presbyterian, Columbia/Cornell training program, New York, NY.
- Aponte H, Acosta S, Rigamonti D, Sylvia B, Austin P, Samolitis T: The use of ultrasound for placement of intravenous catheters. AANA J 2007, 75: 212–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blaivas M, Brannam L, Fernandez E: Short-axis versus long-axis approaches for teaching ultrasound-guided vascular access on a new inanimate model. Acad Emerg Med 2003, 10: 1307–11. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00002.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brannam L, Blaivas M, Lyon M, Flake M: Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. Acad Emerg Med 2004, 11: 1361–3. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb01929.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chinnock B, Thornton S, Hendey GW: Predictors of success in nurse-performed ultrasound-guided cannulation. J Emerg Med 2007, 33: 401–5. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.02.027PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Costantino TG, Parikh AK, Satz WA, Fojtik JP: Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 2005, 46: 456–61. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.12.026PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dugan L, Leech L, Speroni KG, Corriher J: Factors affecting hemolysis rates in blood samples drawn from newly placed IV sites in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 2005, 31: 338–45. 10.1016/j.jen.2005.05.004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Keyes LE, Frazee BW, Snoey ER, Simon BC, Christy D: Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 1999, 34: 711–4. 10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70095-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marinella MA, Kathula SK, Markert RJ: Spectrum of upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis in a community teaching hospital. Heart Lung 2000, 29: 113–7. 10.1016/S0147-9563(00)90006-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mills CN, Liebwomann O, Stone MB, Frazee BW: Ultrasonographically guided insertion of a 15-cm catheter into the deep brachial or basilic vein in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 2007, 50: 68–72. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.02.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Panebianco NLFJ, Szyld D, Sagalyn EB, Pines JM, Dean AJ: Ultrasound-guided peripheral IV access: patient pain, anxiety and preference. Ann Emerg Med 2008, 52: S61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rose JS, Norbutas CM: A randomized controlled trial comparing one-operator versus two-operator technique in ultrasound-guided basilic vein cannulation. J Emerg Med 2008, 35: 431–5. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.11.009PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rothschild: Ultrasound guidance of central vein catheterization: evidence report/technology assessment. In Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. No 43. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ publication no 01-E058; 2001:245–53.Google Scholar
- Sierzenski PPD, Baty G, Nichols WL, Kochert E, Bollinger M, Reed J III: Junior emergency medicine residents demonstrate improved accuracy for the identification of a central venous-tip with a long axis ultrasound transducer orientation. Ann Emerg Med 2008, 52: S50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stein J, George B, River G, Hebig A, McDermott D: Ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access: a randomized trial. Ann Emerg Med 2008.Google Scholar
- Witting MSS, Lawner B, Euerle B: Effects of vein width and depth in ultrasound guided IV insertion. Ann Emerg Med 2008, 52: S127.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stone MB, Moon C, Sutijono D, Blaivas M: Needle tip visualization during ultrasound-guided vascular access: short-axis vs. long-axis approach. Am J Emerg Med 2010, 28: 343–347.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.